Comments on: Hello Google DocType, Goodbye WebDevout http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/05/14/hello-google-doctype-goodbye-webdevout/ Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:56:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: FataL http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/05/14/hello-google-doctype-goodbye-webdevout/comment-page-1/#comment-1028 FataL Thu, 15 May 2008 16:06:02 +0000 http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2008/05/14/hello-google-doctype-goodbye-webdevout/#comment-1028 I was wrong about Google Doctype w/o JavaScript. Actually it works -- you can browse and read. I was wrong about Google Doctype w/o JavaScript. Actually it works — you can browse and read.

]]> By: FataL http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/05/14/hello-google-doctype-goodbye-webdevout/comment-page-1/#comment-1027 FataL Thu, 15 May 2008 15:53:22 +0000 http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2008/05/14/hello-google-doctype-goodbye-webdevout/#comment-1027 Google Doctype is just another good illustration to "Stop using Ajax!" article ( http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/stop-using-ajax/ ). It's new kind of stupidity -- to make simple documentation unreadable w/o JavaScript and be so browser dependent. Google wants standards? Don't make me laught! Their pages about standarts don't even validate, I even don't want to mention accessibility here. There are many places with good, useful and accessible documentation. Google Doctype is just another good illustration to “Stop using Ajax!” article ( http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/stop-using-ajax/ ).

It’s new kind of stupidity — to make simple documentation unreadable w/o JavaScript and be so browser dependent.

Google wants standards? Don’t make me laught! Their pages about standarts don’t even validate, I even don’t want to mention accessibility here.

There are many places with good, useful and accessible documentation.

]]>