<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parameterizing SVG and HTML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/comment-page-1/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>Update:  Apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=2426&amp;to=2427&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;browsers send in the attributes&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;object&gt; element to the plugin as well the &lt;param&gt; elements.  HTML 5 favors the plugin over the native content handler even more than I thought it did before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update:  Apparently <a href="http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=2426&#038;to=2427" rel="nofollow">browsers send in the attributes</a> of the &#60;object&#62; element to the plugin as well the &#60;param&#62; elements.  HTML 5 favors the plugin over the native content handler even more than I thought it did before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/comment-page-1/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>@Kevin:  You got it on the second try, but instead of PHP, you can do the same thing with HTML files (url.html?caption=A) meaning parameters can be processed by JS in the browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kevin:  You got it on the second try, but instead of PHP, you can do the same thing with HTML files (url.html?caption=A) meaning parameters can be processed by JS in the browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin H</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/comment-page-1/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Oh, Wait!



I think I get it now.  I suspect that what you want to be able to do is the equivalent of calling url.php?caption=A and then url.php?caption=B without making 2 separate calls to the server (loading url.php out of the cache on the second fetch, and letting it process the caption=B parameter client-side).  For this example usage, you are right, query strings are completely inappropriate.



While I&#039;m too unfamiliar with SVG to say if there is an alternate way of doing what you want, I think typically this sort of behavior is limited to &lt;SCRIPT&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Wait!</p>
<p>I think I get it now.  I suspect that what you want to be able to do is the equivalent of calling url.php?caption=A and then url.php?caption=B without making 2 separate calls to the server (loading url.php out of the cache on the second fetch, and letting it process the caption=B parameter client-side).  For this example usage, you are right, query strings are completely inappropriate.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m too unfamiliar with SVG to say if there is an alternate way of doing what you want, I think typically this sort of behavior is limited to &#60;SCRIPT&#62;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin H</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/comment-page-1/#comment-1101</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/#comment-1101</guid>
		<description>&gt;  In my experiments with PHP, I found that query parameters are a good way to ensure the browser actually re-fetches a document and doesn’t rely on the document in the cache.



I think you need to re-run your experiment, or publish your methodology and findings so they can be scrutinized.  Because the presence of a query string in a GET should &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt;, in practice, adversely affect the cacheability of that request.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#62;  In my experiments with PHP, I found that query parameters are a good way to ensure the browser actually re-fetches a document and doesn’t rely on the document in the cache.</p>
<p>I think you need to re-run your experiment, or publish your methodology and findings so they can be scrutinized.  Because the presence of a query string in a GET should <em>not</em>, in practice, adversely affect the cacheability of that request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Dahlström</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/comment-page-1/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Dahlström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2008/07/25/parameterizing-svg-and-html/#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>I agree that this is a feature that the HTML WG shouldn&#039;t dismiss so quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that this is a feature that the HTML WG shouldn&#8217;t dismiss so quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
