<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So&#8230; What&#8217;d I Miss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>Ducks bitch! (&lt;a href=&quot;http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm5aAMC8vT0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ref&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ducks bitch! (<a href="http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Dm5aAMC8vT0" rel="nofollow">ref</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyrobo</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyrobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>My script uses arrays I compiled based on your data. It doesn&#039;t reference your files at all. I&#039;ve since updated it to reflect what you&#039;ve said about the possibly invalid test.



All I had to do was subtract the position from the total width to get RTL. It would be trivial to change, and here&#039;s what it would look like:



http://databathing.com/SVG/?LTR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My script uses arrays I compiled based on your data. It doesn&#8217;t reference your files at all. I&#8217;ve since updated it to reflect what you&#8217;ve said about the possibly invalid test.</p>
<p>All I had to do was subtract the position from the total width to get RTL. It would be trivial to change, and here&#8217;s what it would look like:</p>
<p><a href="http://databathing.com/SVG/?LTR" rel="nofollow">http://databathing.com/SVG/?LTR</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>@Gyrobo:  Here are the answers:



1) I have the spreadsheet listed in numerical order, but then I rotate the entire thing during &#039;publish&#039; time clockwise to get the desired effect (user agents on the left column, tests on the top).  I hadn&#039;t thought about the ramifications of this decision until now.  I&#039;m afraid to change things in case your script would now be borked...



2) There is one test that I believe is invalid in the 1.1 test suite.  I haven&#039;t investigated fully, but since every browser/plugin/etc gets it wrong it made me suspicious.  Eventually I&#039;ll be moving over to the 1.2T test suite (much larger) when more browsers get into the game.  That test suite is being actively maintained (I get the impression that the 1.1F test suite is bit-rotting).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gyrobo:  Here are the answers:</p>
<p>1) I have the spreadsheet listed in numerical order, but then I rotate the entire thing during &#8216;publish&#8217; time clockwise to get the desired effect (user agents on the left column, tests on the top).  I hadn&#8217;t thought about the ramifications of this decision until now.  I&#8217;m afraid to change things in case your script would now be borked&#8230;</p>
<p>2) There is one test that I believe is invalid in the 1.1 test suite.  I haven&#8217;t investigated fully, but since every browser/plugin/etc gets it wrong it made me suspicious.  Eventually I&#8217;ll be moving over to the 1.2T test suite (much larger) when more browsers get into the game.  That test suite is being actively maintained (I get the impression that the 1.1F test suite is bit-rotting).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyrobo</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-1212</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyrobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/#comment-1212</guid>
		<description>There was no scraping script involved. I copied each value by hand to burn the results into my memory, so I would be prepared in case the topic came up at a party.



I have two questions, though:



1) Is there a particular reason your graph places the tests in a RTL order? When my LTR graph didn&#039;t look anything like yours, I thought I&#039;d gone insane.



2) In your full support table, you seem to have removed a test from the total maximum score. Is that because of spec changes between 1.1 and 1.2, or did you just try to curve it to get some of the browsers up a letter grade? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was no scraping script involved. I copied each value by hand to burn the results into my memory, so I would be prepared in case the topic came up at a party.</p>
<p>I have two questions, though:</p>
<p>1) Is there a particular reason your graph places the tests in a RTL order? When my LTR graph didn&#8217;t look anything like yours, I thought I&#8217;d gone insane.</p>
<p>2) In your full support table, you seem to have removed a test from the total maximum score. Is that because of spec changes between 1.1 and 1.2, or did you just try to curve it to get some of the browsers up a letter grade? <img src='http://www.codedread.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-1211</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/#comment-1211</guid>
		<description>@Steve: :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve: <img src='http://www.codedread.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ryner</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/comment-page-1/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ryner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/01/30/so-whatd-i-miss/#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Google I/O. At $300 it&#039;s less than a developer phone. Should bring that up with someone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Google I/O. At $300 it&#8217;s less than a developer phone. Should bring that up with someone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
