<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More SVG Support Scores&#8230; and Konqueror?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:16:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dani</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>dani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Sorry, no information for the khtml.

For the svg animation on fx 3.6pre, I&#039;ve to enable &lt;code&gt;svg.smil.enabled&lt;/code&gt; to &lt;code&gt;true&lt;/code&gt;. I could see the svg partial animation only. Opera 9.6* still better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, no information for the khtml.</p>
<p>For the svg animation on fx 3.6pre, I&#8217;ve to enable <code>svg.smil.enabled</code> to <code>true</code>. I could see the svg partial animation only. Opera 9.6* still better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>@taken:  Thanks for the information here!  Somehow I missed this.  So are you saying that the GSOC project hasn&#039;t made it over the line yet?  Is the existing SVG implementation in Konq 4.2.1 coming from KSVG, KSVG2 or something else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@taken:  Thanks for the information here!  Somehow I missed this.  So are you saying that the GSOC project hasn&#8217;t made it over the line yet?  Is the existing SVG implementation in Konq 4.2.1 coming from KSVG, KSVG2 or something else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taken</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>taken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>At Google Summer of Code 2008, there was a project to port WebKit&#039;s SVG implementation to KHTML.



http://vtokarev.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/gsoc-svg-now-konq-knows-how-to-write/

http://code.google.com/soc/2008/kde/appinfo.html?csaid=A785D7E84951DE33



KHTML 4 still lucks SVG support, though.



BTW, you can use WebKit on Konqueror on Kubuntu by installing &quot;webkitkde&quot; package. Then you can select View -&gt; View Mode -&gt; WebKit.

# I tested that on Konqueror 4.1.4/Ubuntu 8.10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Google Summer of Code 2008, there was a project to port WebKit&#8217;s SVG implementation to KHTML.</p>
<p><a href="http://vtokarev.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/gsoc-svg-now-konq-knows-how-to-write/" rel="nofollow">http://vtokarev.wordpress.com/2008/07/22/gsoc-svg-now-konq-knows-how-to-write/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://code.google.com/soc/2008/kde/appinfo.html?csaid=A785D7E84951DE33" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/soc/2008/kde/appinfo.html?csaid=A785D7E84951DE33</a></p>
<p>KHTML 4 still lucks SVG support, though.</p>
<p>BTW, you can use WebKit on Konqueror on Kubuntu by installing &#8220;webkitkde&#8221; package. Then you can select View -&#62; View Mode -&#62; WebKit.</p>
<p># I tested that on Konqueror 4.1.4/Ubuntu 8.10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lilley</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lilley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>another reason recently given (for failing Acid 3) &quot;Because Standards Not Official&quot;

http://www.osnews.com/story/21193/_IE8_Does_Not_Pass_Acid3_Because_Standards_Not_Official_

apparently, SVG 1.1 and DOM Level 2 are still drafts. They believe.



On to KSVG - yes, weird. I will see if I can find whats up there with the lack of current web page. Possibly they are in mid churn (the initial code direction was KDOM and KSVG2 -&gt; Webkit, now its more the other way round).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another reason recently given (for failing Acid 3) &#8220;Because Standards Not Official&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/21193/_IE8_Does_Not_Pass_Acid3_Because_Standards_Not_Official_" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story/21193/_IE8_Does_Not_Pass_Acid3_Because_Standards_Not_Official_</a></p>
<p>apparently, SVG 1.1 and DOM Level 2 are still drafts. They believe.</p>
<p>On to KSVG &#8211; yes, weird. I will see if I can find whats up there with the lack of current web page. Possibly they are in mid churn (the initial code direction was KDOM and KSVG2 -&#62; Webkit, now its more the other way round).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stelt</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>stelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>according to http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/01/more-details-ab.html :

MS said :&quot;There is no official roadmap for IE9, but native SVG support is likely.&quot;



Though time and time again SVG is asked for rather strongly by the market,

many are rather skeptical, have seen too many empty promises. Is it again like MS riding you like a donkey, holding a carrot on a stick in front of you, making you walk towards it, but never coming closer really?



And MS rather have us use their proprietary SilVerliGht instead.



Some possible scenarios?

-no SVG support in IE9

-SVG support on top of Silverlight

-no real SVG support, but a faulty version. remember embrace, extend, ...?

-outstanding really native SVG support



As MS has lost respect with many web developers (IE&#039;s bad standards support limits options for web developers, and brings on a lot of extra hassle), it could really use to regain some respect from them. Outstanding really native SVG support would certainly help on that a lot. And with an IE marketshare that has been dropping for years, this might just be the thing MS needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>according to <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/01/more-details-ab.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/01/more-details-ab.html</a> :</p>
<p>MS said :&#8221;There is no official roadmap for IE9, but native SVG support is likely.&#8221;</p>
<p>Though time and time again SVG is asked for rather strongly by the market,</p>
<p>many are rather skeptical, have seen too many empty promises. Is it again like MS riding you like a donkey, holding a carrot on a stick in front of you, making you walk towards it, but never coming closer really?</p>
<p>And MS rather have us use their proprietary SilVerliGht instead.</p>
<p>Some possible scenarios?</p>
<p>-no SVG support in IE9</p>
<p>-SVG support on top of Silverlight</p>
<p>-no real SVG support, but a faulty version. remember embrace, extend, &#8230;?</p>
<p>-outstanding really native SVG support</p>
<p>As MS has lost respect with many web developers (IE&#8217;s bad standards support limits options for web developers, and brings on a lot of extra hassle), it could really use to regain some respect from them. Outstanding really native SVG support would certainly help on that a lot. And with an IE marketshare that has been dropping for years, this might just be the thing MS needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mabdul</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>mabdul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>and they have vml! their own &quot;standard&quot; by iso, invented by ms. They have the same scripting language under different names since ie 5.5!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and they have vml! their own &#8220;standard&#8221; by iso, invented by ms. They have the same scripting language under different names since ie 5.5!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Schiller</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Schiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 01:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>I have ideas, yes. :)



According to Microsoft, the reasons they do not yet support IE natively in SVG are:



&lt;ol&gt;

&lt;li&gt;They haven&#039;t had time/resources enough for it (needed to focus on CSS 2.1 and HTML5 improvements in IE8)&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;They haven&#039;t had enough demand/complaints for it yet&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;li&gt;They are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/20/ie_8_standards_future/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;confused&lt;/a&gt; about which spec to support (SVGF 1.1, SVGT 1.2)&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have ideas, yes. <img src='http://www.codedread.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>According to Microsoft, the reasons they do not yet support IE natively in SVG are:</p>
<ol>
<li>They haven&#8217;t had time/resources enough for it (needed to focus on CSS 2.1 and HTML5 improvements in IE8)</li>
<li>They haven&#8217;t had enough demand/complaints for it yet</li>
<li>They are <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/20/ie_8_standards_future/" rel="nofollow">confused</a> about which spec to support (SVGF 1.1, SVGT 1.2)</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chas4</title>
		<link>http://www.codedread.com/blog/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Chas4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codedread.com/archives/2009/03/29/more-svg-support-scores-and-konqueror/#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>Any idea why Microsoft refuses to add native support for SVG in IE?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea why Microsoft refuses to add native support for SVG in IE?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
