{"id":190,"date":"2005-12-07T10:21:36","date_gmt":"2005-12-07T16:21:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.codedread.com\/?p=190"},"modified":"2005-12-07T10:21:36","modified_gmt":"2005-12-07T16:21:36","slug":"adobe-unofficially-clarifies-its-svg-position","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/archives\/2005\/12\/07\/adobe-unofficially-clarifies-its-svg-position\/","title":{"rendered":"Adobe Unofficially Clarifies Its SVG Position"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jon Ferraiolo of Adobe <a href=\"http:\/\/groups.yahoo.com\/group\/svg-developers\/message\/53433\">responds to concerns<\/a> about Adobe's <a href=\"http:\/\/www.adobe.com\/aboutadobe\/invrelations\/adobeandmacromedia_faq.html\">less-than-clear statements about SVG<\/a> the \"morning after\" the post-Macromedia <span class=\"definition\" title=\"consumation\">acquisition<\/span>.  Jon says that \"SVG-Full\" support will not be disrupted - - not exactly a glowing recommendation, but not exactly a death sentence.  I had <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.codedread.com\/archives\/2005\/12\/06\/the-svg-roller-coaster\/\">speculated on this yesterday<\/a>, so Jon's response soothes my fears somewhat.  He says that \"Adobe's primary attitude towards SVG is fully positive\" and the FAQ mention of SVG-T only \"was *not* meant to imply anything negative about SVG in the desktop space\" but I still maintain that zero mention of Adobe SVG Viewer is not a good sign.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, if the SVG 1.2 specs could just make it into Recommendation Status we'd see what implementors like Adobe and EvolGrafiX can do...<\/p>\n<p><em>[Update:  The day I posted this, the W3C SVG Working Group <a href=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/News\/2005#item181\">released its Third Last Call draft for SVG Tiny 1.2<\/a> with a comment cutoff date of December 28th.  Now that's service!]<\/em><br \/>\n<script type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"http:\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/show_ads.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jon Ferraiolo of Adobe responds to concerns about Adobe&#8217;s less-than-clear statements about SVG the &#8220;morning after&#8221; the post-Macromedia acquisition. Jon says that &#8220;SVG-Full&#8221; support will not be disrupted &#8211; &#8211; not exactly a glowing recommendation, but not exactly a death sentence. I had speculated on this yesterday, so Jon&#8217;s response soothes my fears somewhat. He [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,25,46,11,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-quicklinks","category-software","category-svg","category-technology","category-web"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.codedread.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}